
Share
25th March 2022
11:52am GMT

Via Getty[/caption]
The former Fantastic Beasts star, 58, was seeking to block Heard from using the state's anti-Slapp statute (Strategic Lawsuit against Public Participation), which means people can argue against nuisance lawsuits when discussing matters of public interest.
The lawsuit, which was launched in 2019 and sought $50m in damages, is regarding an article Heard wrote for the Bezos-owned outlet entitled: "I spoke up against sexual violence — and faced our culture's wrath. That has to change."
Heard's lawyer Elaine Bredehoft argued that Depp was not named anywhere in the article - but Depp's legal counsel, Benjamin Chew, argued that such anti-Slapp rules are not designed to be employed during private disputes. Naturally, Bredehoft said that such topics as domestic abuse are public domain.
[caption id="attachment_325339" align="alignnone" width="2048"]
Via Getty[/caption]
According to the Mail Online, Depp's lawyers moved the case to Fairfax, Virginia, where anti-Slapp rules are less broad but Heard's team is trying to move the case back to California, where they both live. Depp was able to move the trial as the Washington Post's online servers are housed there.
Next month's April 11 trial is expected to include a plethora of A-list talent witnesses, including James Franco, Elon Musk, Marvel's Paul Bettany, and J.K Rowling.
Explore more on these topics: