Share
9th June 2021
11:55am BST
Via Getty @Hollie Adams[/caption]
The communications firm is run by James Frayne and Rachel Wolf, who are both personal friends of the political strategist. The firm was inevitably paid ££564,393 for their "incredibly urgent" research and development consultancy.
Cummings himself has admitted to having a personal connection with the firm: "I am friends with James Frayne, Rachel Wolfe and Gabriel Milland."
https://twitter.com/david_conn/status/1402561804107190272
The challenge failed on two grounds. Firstly, the government could have used existing suppliers to conduct the research needed. The second was that the six-month contract was disproportionate. However, the challenge did succeed on the third point that "gave rise to apparent bias contrary to principles of public law".
Mrs Justice O'Farrell, the leading judge on the case, had the following to say in her final assessment:
"[Dominic Cummings'] professional and personal connections with Public First did not preclude him from making an impartial assessment… "However, [the Cabinet Office's] failure to consider any other research agency, by reference to experience, expertise, availability or capacity, would lead a fair minded and informed observer to conclude that there was a real possibility, or a real danger, that the decision maker was biased."She added that "The claimant is entitled to a declaration that decision of 5 June 2020 to award the contract to Public First gave rise to apparent bias and was unlawful." The Director of the Good Law Project said: "This is not Government for the public good - it is Government for the good of friends of the Conservative Party. A hearing at a later date will determine whether or not the Government can appeal the decision - the same goes for Gove. https://twitter.com/PoliticsJOE_UK/status/1402576338708582402?s=20
Explore more on these topics:
