
Sport
Share
Published 21:27 29 Sept 2021 BST

This, Jowell said, led to an "unfair application of rules" and an "abuse of its position which distorted competition."
The consortium looking to buy Newcastle Untied last summer were unable to complete a £300m deal and walked away from a proposed takeover after a dispute with the Premier League over whether members of Saudi Arabia's ruling government would also become directors of the club, meaning they would have to undertake the league's owners' and directors' test. The main leader who intended to supply the funds, Mohammed bin Salman, had been accused of human rights abuses, which he denies. The company Beln Sports is in disagreement with Saudi Arabia in relation to the piracy of Premier League matches, which the Qatar-based company currently has the rights to. Newcastle have since then been locked in two separate legal disputes over the competition appeal tribunal and who would actually run the club should the takeover be completed. During the competition appeal tribunal hearing, Daniel Jowell QC stated that the collapse of the takeover had cost Newcastle losses "in excess of £10m" and that the Premier League had not "carried through with its threat to stop the club participating in the competition." Jowell then went on to say: "If the Premier League came to its senses and reversed its decision, we hope [the buyers] might be prepared to go forward on similar terms." The Premier League has so far refused to comment on the proceedings, as per the BBC. Related links:Explore more on these topics: