
Sport
Share
Published 18:10 12 Jan 2019 GMT
Updated 19:33 12 Jan 2019 GMT

Another former footballer and current pundit was the one who mentioned the word "cheating" regarding spygate. That same former footballer has previously defended diving - which, for the record, is also fine - as just another measure used to win games.
Thankfully, people with a sense of proportion and humour have also spoken out, while a host of examples prove that what he did is not uncommon.
Aside from Neville's comment, Ireland international Jon Walters praised the Argentine for admitting what he had done, and added a touch of perspective, saying that he knew of worse that had happened in football, both by teams he has played for and against.
https://twitter.com/JonWalters19/status/1083833410492223488
It was revealed this week that in December, TSG 1899 Hoffenheim discovered a drone controlled by a Werder Bremen coach attempting to observe their training session.
The response of Hoffenheim coach Julian Nagelsmann? "I'm not really angry at the analyst doing his job. It's commendable if they're doing everything they can, trying to spy on the opposition."
https://twitter.com/honigstein/status/1083885208565399553
What these sensible reactions allude to and what the more over-the-top ones painfully miss is, quite simply, that football is just a game.
It is a game with millions of pound on the line, but it is a game nonetheless.
What Bielsa did, or ordered his member of staff to do, was not illegal, nor did it hurt anyone. He did not pay a member of the paparazzi to go out onto the street and take photographs of a down-on-their-luck former England international to catch them in a compromising position, but instead simply sought to gain an advantage for his team.
Gaining an advantage in any way possible is often praised by pundits and journalists alike as what differentiates the great managers from the good or bad, so why have Bielsa’s actions caused such offence?
Is it because Bielsa is not British? While simplistic, that is a possibility. English football has long considered itself the gatekeepers of the modern game, even at times when its neighbours on the continent consistently proved themselves more capable of bringing the game into the future. Football on these isles has always been resistant to change from elsewhere, so that could be partly the reason for this reaction.
Another, more likely reason, is that Bielsa's behaviour fractures the veneer of politeness, and decorum, that many believe remains in English football and British sport as a whole.
It is the veneer that somehow makes diving worse than breaking someone's leg with a high tackle, that leads some to cast rugby as a sport played by gentlemen and football one played by thugs despite the facts showing that this is simply not the case, and it is the veneer which - unfortunately - means many would rather discuss acts such as this than important issues genuinely damaging the game.
Bielsa doesn’t have time for that veneer. And if people took a moment to dismount from their high horses and view the game with a little less seriousness and a little more humour, they'd realise that it is exactly the sort of thing which makes this game what it is.Explore more on these topics: