
Sport
Share
Published 13:20 23 Oct 2016 BST

Referee Craig Pawson decided not to punish Sissoko for the challenge, but he could still be banned retrospectively. However, speaking after the game, Arter explained that there was no intent from Sissoko and he would prefer if no action was taken against him.
"He said to me afterwards that he did catch me but that it was by accident." "He doesn't seem to be that sort of player, so I'm sure it was by accident and hopefully we can move on from it."We'll see if the Premier League also conclude that Sissoko didn't mean to catch the Bournemouth man. If they do decide to hand the Frenchman a retrospective ban then he could miss important Premier League games against Leicester City and Arsenal.
Explore more on these topics:
CONMEBOL president ‘leaks’ major World Cup 2030 change in unexpected announcement
The World Cup is getting even bigger Football’s biggest tournament could be about to get even bigger after a major proposal for the 2030 World Cup. CONMEBOL President Alejandro Domínguez has announced that plans are being put forward to expand the tournament to 64 teams as part of the competition’s 100th anniversary celebrations. If approved, […]
Sport
12h
Kevin Keegan has died aged 75
BREAKING Football legend Kevin Keegan has passed away at the age of 75, a statement from his family has confirmed. Keegan was reportedly diagnosed with stage four stomach cancer in January. The statement made by Keegan’s family reads: “It is with immense sadness that we announce that Kevin Keegan has passed away at the age […]
Sport
1 day ago

Sport
Former Man Utd star identifies the exact moment Jude Bellingham’s performance was ‘ruined’
Sport