
Entertainment
Share
Published 09:06 23 Sept 2015 BST

That's why you rarely see the song sung in movies or on TV shows - because Warner charge an arm and a leg for the privilege.
But all that is about to change, because a federal judge in the US has ruled that Warner don't in fact own the copyright for the ditty - only a very specific arrangement.
As the LA Times reports:
Judge George H. King ruled Tuesday afternoon that a copyright filed by the [Clayton F.] Summy Co. in 1935 granted only the rights to specific arrangements of the music, not the actual song itself. “Because Summy Co. never acquired the rights to the Happy Birthday lyrics,” wrote Judge George H. King, “Defendants, as Summy Co.’s purported successors-in-interest, do not own a valid copyright in the Happy Birthday lyrics.”So your nan can now sing it to her heart's delight, safe in the knowledge she's not a hardened criminal for doing so.

The JOE Film Club Quiz: Week 107
Entertainment

‘Rip-off’ contracts costing Brits £576 a year
Entertainment
‘Entitled dad’ demanded I swap my £150 plane seat but got quickly humbled
Passenger goes viral after refusing seat swap A passenger who refused to give up his window seat for a stranger’s child, despite paying extra for it, has been defended online after sharing the awkward encounter on Reddit. The man explained on the “entitledparents” subreddit that the incident happened in 2019 while he was flying back […]
Entertainment
3 days ago
Kit Connor and Joe Locke reflect on the emotional end of Heartstopper
‘The end of an era’ After four years, three series and a devoted global fanbase, Netflix has officially brought Heartstopper to a close with the feature-length finale, Heartstopper Forever. The film picks up directly after the events of series three and follows the couple as they face one of the biggest changes in their relationship […]
Entertainment
3 days ago
Entertainment
Tom Hardy’s hit crime thriller drops S2 first look after reported on-set drama
Entertainment