
Entertainment
Share
Published 09:06 23 Sept 2015 BST

That's why you rarely see the song sung in movies or on TV shows - because Warner charge an arm and a leg for the privilege.
But all that is about to change, because a federal judge in the US has ruled that Warner don't in fact own the copyright for the ditty - only a very specific arrangement.
As the LA Times reports:
Judge George H. King ruled Tuesday afternoon that a copyright filed by the [Clayton F.] Summy Co. in 1935 granted only the rights to specific arrangements of the music, not the actual song itself. “Because Summy Co. never acquired the rights to the Happy Birthday lyrics,” wrote Judge George H. King, “Defendants, as Summy Co.’s purported successors-in-interest, do not own a valid copyright in the Happy Birthday lyrics.”So your nan can now sing it to her heart's delight, safe in the knowledge she's not a hardened criminal for doing so.

Oasis release cryptic video as rumours swirl around new tour
I said maybe…there could be another tour Fans are once again going into hyperdrive for Oasismania after the iconic band released a cryptic video across all their social media sites. The Gallagher brothers infamously reunited last year for a world tour for the ages, bringing Oasis to new generations and also back to their most […]
Entertainment
3 days ago
One million people set to receive £50 payment from HMRC – here’s how to not miss out
Letters sent by HMRC entitling UK residents with tax relief payment His Majesty’s Revenue and Customs (HMRC) department has sent out letters to roughly one million UK residents, entitling them to £53 on average. The government department charged with tax collection and financial state support is writing to low income individuals who have missed out […]
Entertainment
3 days ago
Beloved BBC show with iconic theme song axed after 50 years
Entertainment