
News
Share
Published 16:59 16 Feb 2017 GMT

"I want to take ownership of a mistake I made. Speaking at a party in what I thought was a personal conversation, I nevertheless made a stupid remark about the First Lady. "My editors have made it clear my behaviour was not in keeping with the standards of the New York Times, and I agree. My mistake, referring to unfounded rumours, shouldn’t reflect on anyone else and I apologise profusely."The New York Times and the Trumps aren't on the best of terms anyway with President Trump repeatedly saying it publishes 'Fake News.' The media organisation released this statement on the matter.
"At a party last night, a Times reporter who does not cover Washington or politics, referred to an unfounded rumour regarding Melania Trump. The comment was not intended to be public, but it was nonetheless completely inappropriate and should not have occurred. Editors have talked to the reporter in question about the lapse."
Explore more on these topics:
Burnham to scrap Starmer’s digital ID scheme as ‘reset of priorities’ revealed
Millions were already against it Incoming prime minister Andy Burnham is expected to scrap Keir Starmer’s plans for digital ID cards in a “reset of priorities”, it has been revealed. As Burnham is set to enter Downing Street on Monday, he will reallocate unspecified resources from unpopular plan to helping with cost of living. Burnham’s […]
News
1 day ago
Andrew Tate and brother Tristan Tate arrested in US
The brothers face 59 combined charges Brothers Andrew and Tristan Tate have been arrested in the US in connection with an investigation headed up by UK police into a number of sexual offences. The Tates were arrested in Miami on Saturday and have been detained pending ongoing legal proceedings. In a statement, Bedfordshire Police said […]
News
2 days ago
News
New Sky alert as customers sent urgent security emails with steps to take
News