
Share
14th August 2021
03:11pm BST

"If you treat it as terrorism then you have other options open to you in terms of intelligence gathering, in terms of being able to prosecute for disseminating materials, in terms of being able to hold them to account if they are conspiring with each other.
"So, there are other potential offences available if you treat it as terrorism, but of course as we currently know that’s not what the government’s intention is."
He added that Davison's social media history painted a "picture of somebody that has a very low opinion or had a very low opinion of women, who seemed to have a belief he was entitled to do whatever he wanted to, a real expectation that women were some kind of lesser being." A key question that local police in Plymouth are facing is how Davison was allowed to legally possess a firearm and license. He had both stripped from him in December 2020, before they were returned in July this year. Related links: Plymouth shooting: Community pays tribute to victims at candlelight vigil Local police under investigation after Plymouth shooting Plymouth timeline: Police detail how Jake Davison killed five people in as many minutes The police watchdog have launched an investigation into the matter, along with looking into whether the force had any information on Davison's mental health. Meanwhile, Jonathan Hall QC, the independent reviewer of terrorism legislation in the UK, has said that the government are likely to consider treating so-called "incels" as terrorists. He told the BBC Radio 4 Today programme: "The question is really whether or not the authorities want to treat the incel phenomenon as a terrorist risk. "That would involve diverting resources or putting resources into it. If we see more of these sorts of attacks, then I have got no doubt that it will be treated more seriously as terrorism." On Friday evening, a candle-lit vigil was held in the local Plymouth community to remember the five victims of the shooting.Explore more on these topics: