
Share
6th July 2016
10:16am BST

"The accused used a lethal weapon and fired not one but four shots into the toilet door knowing full well that there was someone behind the door. The toilet was a small cubicle and there was no room for escape for the person behind the door. The accused had been trained in the use of and handling of fire arms."The judge continued by recounting the mitigating factors that she believed justified a reduced sentence of six years. According to the judge, Pistorius "approached the bathroom in the belief an intruder was inside. He was without his prosthesis and felt vulnerable. His belief of an intruder is supported by his actions when he realised it was the deceased in the toilet."
"He was distraught and kept on asking God to save the deceased’s life."
Justice Masipa added: "I am of the view that a long term of imprisonment would not serve justice in this case."
Pistorius’s defence were appealing for a non-custodial sentence and highlighted anger management workshops he had participated in as proof of his rehabilitation. Judge Masipa responded by saying the rehabilitation programmes on offer may not be sufficient with the sentence being upgraded to murder, but said he was a “good candidate for rehabilitation."
Pistorius's brother Carl has tweeted this in reaction to the verdict.
https://twitter.com/carlpistorius/status/750615981001703425?ref_src=twsrc%5EtfwExplore more on these topics: