
Share
29th September 2018
07:22pm BST

She said: "Assuming the earliest they would be able to give the new offer is early next week, that still leaves us a few days to respond.
"How do they expect us to be able to get a legal opinion in such a short time? It’s totally unreasonable.
"There had been rumours about closing the Hong Kong base in recent years. We had expected doomsday to come one day, but we had not expected BA to handle it in such an ugly manner.
"It is betraying the staff members who have been so loyal to the company.
"It would be naive for the company to think they can stop us from staging protests if they can fire us all quickly. There are still many ways of resistance. And they have not seen anything yet."
All 85 of the airline's staff operating out of its Hong Kong base were sacked on Wednesday September 26. 61 of that number work on permanent terms, four of which were on sick leave and did not receive their letters of dismissal on the same day as their colleagues. Regardless, they are still being forced to adhere to the same deadlines. Civic Party lawmaker Jeremy Tam Man-ho was one of the speakers at the protest, according to the South China Morning Post he said: "The longest-serving employee has worked with the company for 32 years, yet in return they are only given three-and-a-half days’ notice ... Why are they being treated like they’re disposable?” BA identified the Hong Kong - Heathrow route, which it flies twice a day, as underperforming at its half-year financial earnings meeting with analysts. Last year British Airways ran an operating profit of £1.77 billion.Explore more on these topics: