
Share
7th May 2019
01:05pm BST

It's very dry, there's some dry shrubbery, it looks pretty dank to be honest, and not in a good way.
That's all fine, King's Landing is in a warm area far to the south of, well, the North, so being warm is understandable.
But take a second if you will to use your eyes to peer at this still depicting the setting of King's Landing from a previous episode.
That is one pretty lush place. It's essentially a city on a peninsula, surrounded by water on three sides, and the side connected to the land leading directly to a vibrant forested area.
There is not a single desert in sight. There isn't even a fucking area of flat land in sight. It is one sloping hill/mountain from the second you reach land.
So what is supposed to have happened? Did Cersei literally salt the earth to create a barren wasteland that would give her a greater view of her enemies? Perhaps, but she would have also needed a digger - which doesn't seem to exist in Thrones - to excavate and flatten the land, which no suspension of disbelief will allow me to consider actually happening.
Instead, the greatest and most obvious answer is that maybe, just maybe, the show runners of Game of Thrones decided that the third to last episode was a good time to change the basic geography of one of the show's key locations.
Which is fine and all, but it does look a bit stupid.
https://twitter.com/thelionsheir/status/1125729549554266112?s=20
https://twitter.com/wannlund/status/1125650257470091264?s=20Explore more on these topics:

Entertainment - JOE.co.uk | Joe.co.uk
entertainment