
Football
Share
Published 11:13 6 Jun 2024 BST
Updated 11:17 6 Jun 2024 BST

Wolves formally submitted a bold proposal to the Premier League in May, triggering a vote on whether VAR should remain in the Premier League.
However, it is understood that it is unlikely that VAR will be scrapped, with the majority of Premier League clubs reportedly set to vote in favour of keeping the assistant technology.
Wolves would need at least 14 votes to be in favour of removing the technology which is highly unlikely when the event is hosted in Harrogate.
Leading the claim, Wolves had a host of controversial decisions go against them in the Premier League last season.
After a late equaliser was prevented against West Ham, Gary O'Neil described the ruling out of the goal as "the worst decision I've ever seen."
Wolves skipper Max Kilman headed home in the ninth minute of injury time, however it was adjudged an offside Tawanda Chirewa was in Lucasz Fabianski's line of vision.
Wolves provided an explanation in belief of why VAR should be scrapped, writing: "The introduction of VAR in 2019/20 was a decision made in good faith and with the best interests of football and the Premier League at heart.
"However, after five seasons of VAR in the Premier League, it is time for a constructive and critical debate on its future."
Three of the "Big 6" Arsenal, Tottenham & Manchester City are reportedly in favour of keeping VAR, as per BBC Sport.
However, head of PGMOL Howard Webb has stated changes to VAR are being looked at, with the majority of clubs acknowledging adjustments are still required to improve VAR.
VAR was introduced in the 2019/20 season & has since been the centre of controversy across all teams in the league, with several managers previously launching rants on the use of the technology.
Mikel Arteta branded the decision not to rule out Anthony Gordon's winner for Newcastle United against Arsenal as "an absolute disgrace", where the ball was adjudged not to have fully gone out of play.
VAR sparked mass headlines across world football when Nottingham Forest were denied penalties on three separate occasions at Everton in April.
This sparked a viral statement on X from Forest, accusing VAR official Stuart Atwell of supporting at-the-time relegation rivals Luton Town.
Read next:
"It's embarrassing. It's a disgrace. That's what it is, a disgrace."
— Sky Sports Premier League (@SkySportsPL) November 4, 2023
Mikel Arteta is NOT happy with the decisions that went against Arsenal in their defeat to Newcastle 😠 pic.twitter.com/wRB4F3Hdvl
Three extremely poor decisions - three penalties not given - which we simply cannot accept.
— Nottingham Forest (@NFFC) April 21, 2024
We warned the PGMOL that the VAR is a Luton fan before the game but they didn’t change him. Our patience has been tested multiple times.
NFFC will now consider its options.
Football

How the final Premier League table would look if every refereeing error was erased
Things would have looked very different. Every major refereeing decision leading up to the final few weeks of the Premier League season have been analysed, to establish how things may have played out differently, had PGMO officials always made the correct calls, in an impressive new report from the Athletic. The 2025/26 season ultimately ended […]
Football
1 day ago
Here’s why French fans riot – even when their team wins
It’s now an infamous tradition Following Paris Saint-Germain’s win in the Champions League final against Arsenal on Saturday, at least 780 people across France were arrested with more than 450 in custody, as football fans clashed with police. A person was found dead after an accident on Paris’s ring road, which rioters tried to block […]
Football
2 days ago
WATCH: Comical moment footballer is run over by his own medical team
Football