Search icon

Lifestyle

08th Nov 2017

How 280 characters would’ve improved the most iconic tweets of our time

Ed Balls

Ciara Knight

They’ve fucked it.

Most people have been blessed with 280 characters on Twitter over the past 24 hours. It’s a confusing time, with most users complaining about this update, and the rest taking the absolute piss.

I don’t want to moan, but this morning I read a 280 character tweet which included a quote tweet of 280 characters. That’s 560 characters. It’s basically a book. I’m exhausted.

But how would 280 characters have impacted some of the most iconic tweets that this godforsaken website has ever produced?

Let’s hypothesise with ten of Twitter’s most iconic tweets.

1. Shaq’s big butt problems deserved a little more context

280 characters:

 

2. Jack’s first tweet was a bit too succinct for my liking

280 characters:

 

3. 50 Cent could’ve gotten his point across a little better with more space

https://twitter.com/50cent/status/22201409032?lang=en

280 characters:

 

4. The CIA’s first tweet was very cool, but could’ve been even cooler

280 characters:

 

5. Michael Owen’s film tweet needed more of a background story

280 characters:

 

6. Ringo’s typo deserved more

280 characters:

 

7. Personally, I could’ve read about Danny Dyer’s zoo grievances all day

280 characters:

 

8. Britney’s thoughts were cruelly restricted by the 140 character limit

280 characters:

 

9. Wayne Rooney’s logistics alienated the general public. We deserved more

280 characters:

 

10. Ed Balls.

280 characters:

 

Topics:

Twitter