This horror cult-classic turns 20, and proves that sometimes film critics can get it very wrong

A terrifying treat.

August 1997. Not a classic month for cinema. Demi Moore started people to "suck my dick" in G.I. Jane, and someone told Shaquille O'Neal he was capable of acting in Steel. All round, not great. However, from the depths of that durge came another movie which, at the time, was also seen as an absolute steaming pile of flop, having been savagely ripped apart by critics and roundly ignored by audiences, but in the 20 years since has amassed a cult following quite unlike any other horror going. Embrace the horror of Event Horizon. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=OVlnER8SxfQ Clip via FilmTrailersChannel With an impressive cast of great character actors like Laurence Fishburne, Sam Neill, Joely Richardson, Jason Isaacs and Kathleen Quinlan, the film was budgeted at $60 million - which is a lot for a horror movie in 1997. Hell, even the Jake Gyllenhaal / Ryan Reynolds sci-fi horror Life from earlier this year didn't cost that much, and that isn't including the cost of inflation from the last two decades. Event Horizon only made $26 million in the U.S. box office. On top of that, the film still currently has a score of just 24% on Rotten Tomatoes, and some of the review quotes are real doozies: "If I were a psychologist hired to analyze the people who made this, I would conclude that everyone involved needed to take their inner child out back and shoot it." - Cinemaphile.org "You look at Event Horizon as you would something that fell out of someone's nose." - Film Freak Central "A retarded Goth version of 2001." - Filmcritic.com "If you want to have that Event Horizon experience without spending the seven bucks, try this instead: Put a bucket on your head. Have a loved one beat on it vigorously with a wrench for 100 minutes. Same difference, and think of the gas you'll save." - Washington Post The film was directed by Paul W.S. Anderson, who had previously directed the live-action adaptation of Mortal Kombat. Anderson later claimed that he turned down directing the sequel to that movie, as well as turning down Alien: Resurrection and the first X-Men movie to make Event Horizon instead. In the years that followed, Anderson would go on to direct Alien VS Predator (terrible), Pompeii (starring Jon Snow, terrible), Death Race (starring Jason Statham, actually better than you remember), The Three Musketeers (with steam-punk hot-air balloons, terrible), Soldier (one of the biggest flops of all time, terrible), and no less than five Resident Evil movies (almost unanimously terrible). However, unlike pretty much everything else in his CV to date, Event Horizon has been given something of a second chance in the years since it was released. The short hand description of Event Horizon is "The Shining in space", which is actually pretty apt. A space-ship heading to ... somewhere (probably Hell) ... and coming back with all the original crew and seemingly with a consciousness of its own, this is a pretty high concept idea, and Anderson manages to pull it off admirably, right up to the gore-heavy final act which has Doctor Grant from Jurassic Park pull his own eyes out, and then somehow put them back in. Before he had even finished shooting the movie, the folks at Paramount were cutting back on the amount of time Anderson had to edit the finished movie, as they would not budge from the release of August 1997 for the movie. They wanted a hit in their pocket before they released Titanic, which at the time was scheduled for release in September 1997 (eventually pushed back to December), and they were convinced that the romantic disaster film was going to be a major loss for them. This resulted in Anderson delivering a rush-job on the first cut - coming in at 130 minutes - and early test screenings had audience members reportedly fainting at the amount of violence, which - if the current cut is anything to judge against - is almost understandable. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=xuJnIJHgQ44 Clip via Shane Del Rey Paramount demanded that cuts be made, and with everyone's back against the walls, the final product currently runs at 95 minutes, which Anderson was reportedly very unhappy with. When the film was released to poor reviews and bad box office, Paramount blamed Anderson, Anderson blamed Paramount, and the world continued turning. However, a funny thing happened that often happens with films that aren't properly appreciated upon their original cinematic release. Like Anchorman, The Bourne Identity and The Shawshank Redemption, Event Horizon became a massive success on home-video. When this happened, Paramount returned to Anderson and requested a "director's cut" of the film, but the edited out 35 minutes of the movie had been improperly stored (in an abandoned Transylvania mine, no joke!), and the additional footage subsequently had become too damaged to be usable for a new edit. Despite all that, Event Horizon still holds up to this day, and what it lacks in originality - aside from The Shining, you can't help but also see shades of Alien and Hellraiser - it more than makes up for with visceral horror and the kind of aesthetic that you just don't see anymore. That cathedral-like abandoned ship. The massively creepy "core" of the ship. The truly chilling score that plays out over the whole thing. The great cast that treat the film with the respect it deserves and most importantly for a horror, a level of mind-bending violence that, even when scaled back, still manages to exceed the levels that most major horror movies would shy away from. 20 years on, Event Horizon is definitely worth another look. Do you see?