
Share
28th June 2018
10:15am BST

Not only does trying to throw a match go against the spirit of the game, but it's very likely that such a plan would blow up in their faces in the next round. Imagine the national shame if Southgate made 10 changes and played out a France-vs-Denmark-esque drab 0-0, only to be knocked out by Colombia in the round of 16.
Self-sabotage resulting in failure would be embarrassing. If you're going to get knocked out, you may as well go down swinging.
Wanting to avoid Brazil while simultaneously proclaiming that football is coming home demonstrates the two contrasting complexes that pervade the English football psyche. We're plucky little England, and we are going to win the World Cup... but only if we can avoid the big boys. If you want to be the best, you have to beat the best.
Would it not make much more sense to think of the Belgium match as a chance to hone our playing style even more, give a few players some more game time - Rashford, Dier et al. - and as a chance to boost team morale even more by beating a very strong team?
It's also worth stating that Brazil have not been the swashbuckling attacking side we remember from the Joga Bonito era. They have been carried by Philippe Coutinho in every game so far. Neymar has shown glimpses of magic but hasn't taken control of games as he did four years ago.
England, meanwhile, are playing with the sort of energy that we've always dreamed they would. They are confident, young, quick, strong and fearless - and while they may well improve in all those areas in the next few years - they possess these qualities now. Today.
Fearing opponents is pointless. Do your homework, of course. Suss out their strengths and weaknesses. But intentionally trying not to win is never a good idea, and Southgate knows that.
He has made no bones about the fact that England will try to win tonight, while Roberto Martínez is expected to make ten changes. That's his prerogative, but it seems risky given the problems that already exist within that squad.Explore more on these topics: