
Share
25th October 2016
09:30pm BST

The media jumped to conclusions and then everyone else piled in with some pretty sweeping and depressing statements...
https://twitter.com/ibangel/status/790779077107994624
https://twitter.com/Katbox5Grantham/status/790720787883831296
https://twitter.com/JimHumbert/status/790587135212544004
https://twitter.com/A10Jim/status/790514619336974336
Except there appeared to be one fundamental problem...it wasn't an Islamic dress at all.
Nope. It was actually a ridiculously expensive Adidas Y-3 poncho, as many people on Twitter were all-too happy to point out.
https://twitter.com/Michael_Taylor_/status/790613208461615104
https://twitter.com/wardahkhalid_/status/790296742038089729
https://twitter.com/GregLabour/status/790521008495202305
https://twitter.com/sad_cringe/status/790874614469713920
https://twitter.com/AcreUK/status/790308932027879424
So we had a little look on Y-3's website and there it was, all 980 worth....
It's even got the same detailing on the front and back of it...
Buzzfeed France even went and asked Adidas and they pretty much confirmed it, saying...
"This poncho is a key piece of the AW16 collection, which features elongated silhouettes and patterns floating in a black which is the brand Y-3 factory.
This room, and the entire collection, were designed to appeal to everyone and does not specifically target Muslims. "
If that didn't convince you, then Jackson was actually photographed the day before in London with the same headband on buying some flowers...
https://twitter.com/DailyMailCeleb/status/789528708780548096?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw
And another photo of her hanging out with her husband in public without her poncho on...

Explore more on these topics:

Entertainment - JOE.co.uk | Joe.co.uk
entertainment